Search terms nobody audited
The keywords you bid on and the searches you actually paid for are different lists. Reviewing the second one weekly is the highest-return habit in paid search and the most commonly skipped.
Paid search · Naperville
Paid search in Naperville is expensive, and it is expensive for a reason that works in your favour if you manage it properly: the audience is affluent, the purchase values are high, and competitors know it. Clicks in the established service categories here cost more than they do twenty minutes west, which punishes sloppy account structure severely and rewards disciplined management more than in cheaper markets.
Most of the Naperville accounts we audit are losing between a quarter and a half of their spend to searches that were never going to convert. That is not unusual and it is not a sign of incompetence — it is the default state of an account that was set up once and left running.
The waste is rarely exotic. It accumulates in a handful of predictable places, and it is almost always invisible from the account dashboard unless somebody goes looking at the search terms report — which is a different report from the keywords report, and the distinction catches a lot of owners out.
Broad match without a maintained negative list is the largest single source. Geographic targeting left on the default setting, which includes people merely showing interest in your area rather than located in it, is the second. After that come ads running at hours nobody answers the phone, and budget spread evenly across services with completely different margins.
The keywords you bid on and the searches you actually paid for are different lists. Reviewing the second one weekly is the highest-return habit in paid search and the most commonly skipped.
The default setting shows ads to people who merely searched about your area from anywhere. Setting it to presence only is a two-minute change that regularly cuts meaningful waste.
Paying for high-intent clicks at 9pm for a business that answers at 8am is buying voicemail. Dayparting against real answering capacity, not against office hours on paper.
A service with four times the margin deserves more than a quarter of the budget. Even distribution is a default, not a decision.
For eligible trades — HVAC, plumbing, electrical, roofing, several others — Local Service Ads sit above the standard paid results and charge per lead rather than per click. They require license and insurance verification, which is a barrier worth clearing because it also keeps out the least serious competitors.
They are not a replacement for a search campaign. LSAs capture the highest-intent local demand efficiently, but they offer limited control over targeting and messaging, and the lead quality needs active disputing to stay clean. The usual structure is LSAs for the emergency and immediate-need demand, standard search for everything requiring more control, and a clear measurement boundary between the two so you know which is actually producing.
A conversion in an ad account is whatever somebody configured it to be, and in a lot of accounts that includes form views, phone-number clicks that never became calls, and duplicate submissions. Optimising toward that number produces campaigns that generate impressive reports and disappointing revenue.
What we track instead is the path from click to booked work. Call tracking that distinguishes a sixty-second wrong number from a genuine enquiry, form submissions deduplicated against existing customers, and where the client's systems allow it, the eventual job value written back against the source. In a market with Naperville's click costs, that distinction is the difference between a campaign that looks profitable and one that is.
Straight answers
Start with a clear read
A free audit of your current paid search: where the spend is leaking, what it is costing per genuine enquiry, and what the account should look like.